DrCashFlow

Champion Author
Massachusetts
Posts:2,449 Points:694,500 Joined:Jun 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 2, 2010 12:58:07 AM
what a surprise.
|
CRV97MA

Rookie Author
Massachusetts
Posts:46 Points:359,100 Joined:Dec 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 1, 2010 12:56:19 PM
Hope they come up with a plan that will maximize clean-up of the spill area and not just "meet" requirements of the EPA.
|
APlus

Veteran Author
San Antonio
Posts:437 Points:197,665 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 1, 2010 5:55:58 AM
Stiffer penalties are passed on to the consumer. I believe the EPA not only needs better plans from this company - but should be regularly checking all oil/chemical companies leak contingency plans to make sure they are current and will work.
|
ifallsguy

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:2,723 Points:756,625 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 1, 2010 2:21:10 AM
nothing anyone does is good enough for EPA. They expect the result of a cleanup to have the water cleaner than the drinking water coming out of a virgin, unpolluted Colorado Creek.
|
realtorguzzler

Veteran Author
Florida
Posts:297 Points:55,785 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Aug 1, 2010 12:02:42 AM
Stiffer penalties will teach them.
|
graceman

Champion Author
Baltimore
Posts:1,278 Points:429,750 Joined:Jun 2008
|
Message Posted: Jul 31, 2010 11:52:16 PM
Why don't they give them a large fine for everyday they aren't approved
|
Amplion

Champion Author
Oregon
Posts:1,531 Points:891,830 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Jul 31, 2010 11:28:00 PM
BHO's CRONIES DROP THE BALL AGAIN !!!!!!!
|
ENORMS

Champion Author
Colorado
Posts:2,158 Points:699,600 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Jul 31, 2010 9:13:44 PM
When the EPA speaks......
|